UK crypto regulation 13 key takeaways

Implementation of the Travel Rule and other regulatory measures related to cryptoassets will ultimately help to support South Africa’s case to secure removal from the Grey List. Brazil’s central bank is developing regulatory requirements for crypto that could enable traditional financial institutions (TradFi) to begin engaging with cryptoassets, while presenting challenges for smaller crypto-native firms. Bessent is expected to be confirmed by the incoming Republican Senate without any cryptocurrency regulations uk problem, and his appointment would break what has been a string of largely crypto-sceptical Treasury Secretaries to date. The outgoing Treasury Secretary, Janet Yellen, has been generally sceptical of cryptoassets, having been outspoken about her concerns related to the risks they present to consumers.

Crypto regulatory affairs: UK Government to progress regulatory updates for stablecoins and crypto from early 2025

As the market for crypto-assets continues to develop Germany is likely to engage in discussions https://www.xcritical.com/ with industry experts and partners to establish a strong and efficient regulatory framework for this emerging sector (Ferreira and Sandner 2021). Amidst the dynamic world of crypto-assets, the UK tried to distinguish itself as an innovator in tackling their complexities by creating a robust regulatory structure. The UK’s regulatory framework for crypto-assets necessitates cooperation among government entities, financial watchdogs and industry participants (Bellucci et al. 2022).

• Germany addresses AML and CFT concerns through its strict licensing process for crypto-asset businesses.
• Whether these rules have the effect of spelling the end of ICO frauds and hailing an increase in NFT-based schemes remains to be seen.
• Comparatively, across the border, KYC rules in France have been hardened to include all crypto transactions, including crypto to crypto transfers.
• Divergent paths are evident in the licensing and registration requirements of crypto-asset businesses in the UK and Germany.
• The long-awaited classification of digital assets as property will give owners much greater legal protections in cases of fraud or property dispute.
• Crypto exchanges and custodian wallet providers must comply with the reporting requirements set by the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI).

Crypto-asset regulatory landscape: a comparative analysis of the crypto-asset regulation in the UK and Germany

As crypto-assets continue to gain mainstream attention, attracting institutional investors and retail participants, establishing clear rules and guidelines can reduce uncertainty and foster confidence in the market. A well-regulated crypto-asset ecosystem can attract greater institutional interest, leading to increased liquidity and more mature and stable markets (Bellavitis et al. 2021). In 2023, the South Korean government’s Act on Cryptocurrency the Protection of Virtual Asset Users went into effect.

Guiding principles driving EU and UK crypto regulatory taxonomy

Jonathan Cavill and Sébastien Ferrière of Pinsent Masons were commenting after the FCA fined CB Payments Limited (CBPL) more than £3.5 million. It is the first time the FCA has used powers under the Electronic Money Regulations (EMRs) to issue a fine – and the first time it has taken formal enforcement action against a cryptoasset business. The potential consequences of breaching voluntary requirements agreed with the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) have been brought into sharp focus with recent enforcement action taken by the regulator, experts in financial regulation have said. The Elliptic Global Policy and Research Group (GPRG) are industry subject matter experts specialized in AML/CFT, sanctions compliance, and financial crime.

The future financial services regulatory regime for cryptoassets in the UK

In Israel, for instance, crypto mining is treated as a business and is subject to corporate income tax. In India and elsewhere, regulatory uncertainty persists, although Canada and the United States are relatively friendly to crypto mining. If the relevant coin is not considered an investment or security and if the fundraising is not conducted in a way which attracts financial regulation, pre-ICO fundraising within the UK to UK targets should not be subject to the regulatory aegis of the FCA.

First, the activity which they engage in could be deemed a “regulated activity” under FSMA 2000. Such person will need to determine whether it needs to become an authorised or exempt person, or can rely on an exclusion, in order to avoid being prohibited from carrying out the regulated activity. According to the directive, CASPs on either end of a transaction must obtain and record information about the originator and beneficiaries of a transaction – including their date of birth and other personal information, and their cryptoasset address. CASPs must also screen originators and beneficiaries of transactions for sanctions, and they should conduct due diligence on their counterparty CASPs as well.

However, certain regulatory gaps and challenges persist in both jurisdictions, such as ambiguities in classification and tax treatment, requiring further attention. The UK’s approach to cryptocurrency regulation, particularly in the absence of specific regulatory frameworks from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) for cryptocurrencies themselves, presents certain risks and clarifications for investors and service providers. This includes protections offered by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) and the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS). The two countries have recently adopted and/or implemented regulatory approaches for regulating cryptocurrencies. However, while the regulatory frameworks for the two countries share many similarities, they are heterogeneous.

The interactive database now tracks over 130 countries— triple the number of countries we first identified as being active in CBDC development in 2020. Even for countries with partial or general bans in place, adoption rates remain high, suggesting that bans are generally ineffective. Uncover the essentials of building and scaling a crypto AML program and how to navigate regulatory change. The comments, opinions, and analyses expressed on Investopedia are for informational purposes online. The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) bans crypto enterprises from operating in the country, stating that they facilitate public financing without approval.

Specifically, it introduces a regulatory framework enabling stablecoins to be incorporated into the current regulations concerning payments in the UK. The Act, therefore, envisages a time when certain stablecoins could be regulated for use as payments. Crypto assets enable new and innovative ways of creating, transferring and storing value, without relying on intermediaries or central authorities.

By using the blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal, financial or any other form of professional advice. No relationship is created with you, nor any duty of care assumed to you, when you use this blog. The blog is not a substitute for obtaining any legal, financial or any other form of professional advice from a suitably qualified and licensed advisor.

The UK Finical Conduct Authority (the “FCA”) does not regulate cryptocurrencies in their pure (coin) form[3]. On 12 September 2017, the FCA issued a warning to the public about investing in ICOs in which it stated that most ICOs will not be regulated by the FCA[4]. This article explains how cryptocurrency generally falls outside the remit of the FCA and considers what, if any, regulatory and legal oversight applies to pre-ICO fundraising. Practitioners facing such cases, and cases where assets are held in cryptocurrency more generally, may consider that the new rules lower the bar for recovery of assets in such cases dramatically. As such, HM Treasury proposes to capture cryptoasset activities provided in, or to the United Kingdom.

It has firmly rebutted the suggestion of banning cryptoassets or regulating them as a form of gambling. They use cryptography to secure transactions, to control the creation of additional units and to verify the transfer of assets between users. Cryptocurrencies seek to operate on a decentralised basis, independent of a central bank. Here we discuss cryptoasset compliance, blockchain analysis, financial crime, sanctions regulation, and how Elliptic supports our crypto business and financial services customers with solutions. Stablecoins currently make up around 5% [6] of the crypto market and their use is mainly for payment in crypto markets. But proposals to launch tokens for wide public use – often called systemic stablecoins – have caught the attention of policymakers, specifically the implications for financial stability and retail payments.

As of September 2024, some governments have created frameworks to provide protection for users, while others bide their time. The EU’s implementation of MiCA’s provision for stablecoins put the EU at the forefront of crypto regulation, PYMNTS reported in July. Having stricter disclosure requirements, regular audits of crypto firms and more robust capital reserve requirements will help build trust and transparency across the marketplace.